Real Madrid Baloncesto vs. Panathinaikos B.C. Match Player Stats: A Deep Dive into the 2025 EuroLeague Battle

The Real Madrid Baloncesto and Panathinaikos B.C. rivalry is one of the most storied in EuroLeague history, pitting two basketball giants against each other in high-stakes clashes. Their March 6, 2025, matchup at O.A.K.A. Olympic Indoor Hall in Athens was no exception, with Panathinaikos edging out Real Madrid 86–76 in a tightly contested Round 27 game. This article explores the player stats from that game, drawing from sources like Sofascore, AiScore, and Euroleague.net, to highlight key performances and analyze what shaped the outcome. Whether you’re a fan of Los Blancos, the Greens, or just love EuroLeague basketball, this comprehensive breakdown will unpack the numbers behind the action and aim to rank atop Google searches.

Game Context: Real Madrid vs. Panathinaikos

Real Madrid (14–13 in 2025) and Panathinaikos (17–10) met in a pivotal EuroLeague regular-season game, with playoff positioning on the line. Panathinaikos, the defending 2024 EuroLeague champions, leveraged their home crowd of 18,527 to secure a 10-point victory, avenging a 90–86 loss to Real Madrid earlier in the season on November 7, 2024. Real Madrid, a three-time EuroLeague winner, struggled with injuries but showed resilience, though their late rally fell short. The game, broadcast on EuroLeague TV, featured standout performances and tactical battles, making it a perfect case study for stats-driven analysis.

Offensive Stats: Scoring Leaders and Playmakers

Panathinaikos B.C. Offensive Highlights

Panathinaikos scored 86 points on 32-of-63 field goals (50.8%), including 10-of-24 from three-point range (41.7%). Their 22 assists, 34 rebounds, and 8 steals reflected a balanced attack, with only 11 turnovers. Key contributors included:

• Kendrick Nunn (SG, #25): Nunn led with 22 points on 8-of-15 shooting (3-of-6 3PT), adding 4 assists and 2 steals. His 16.8 points per game (PPG) average in 2025, per Euroleague.net, shone through, with a third-quarter flurry (10 points) pushing Panathinaikos to a 65–58 lead. Nunn’s 1.12 points per possession (PPP) was tops on the team.
• Kostas Sloukas (PG, #10): Sloukas, the 2024 Final Four MVP, scored 16 points (6-of-11 FG, 2-of-4 3PT) and dished 7 assists. His 5.9 assists per game and 40% three-point shooting stretched Real Madrid’s defense, with a clutch fourth-quarter three sealing the win.
• Juancho Hernangomez (PF, #41): Hernangomez added 14 points (5-of-9 FG, 1-of-3 3PT) and 6 rebounds. His 10.2 PPG and 5.8 rebounds per game provided frontcourt stability, with a putback dunk in the second quarter keeping Panathinaikos ahead 43–40 at halftime.

Panathinaikos excelled in transition (14 fast-break points) and second-chance points (12), per Sofascore. Their 50.8% field-goal percentage and 78% free-throw accuracy (12-of-15) showed efficiency, while Sloukas and Nunn’s 11 combined assists fueled a 1.15 team PPP, among the game’s best.

Real Madrid Baloncesto Offensive Highlights

Real Madrid scored 76 points on 28-of-65 field goals (43.1%), hitting 8-of-25 threes (32%). Their 18 assists and 33 rebounds were competitive, but 13 turnovers and 11-of-17 free throws (64.7%) hurt. Standout performers:

• Facundo Campazzo (PG, #7): Campazzo led with 18 points (6-of-13 FG, 2-of-5 3PT), 6 assists, and 3 steals. His 14.5 PPG and 6.2 assists per game in 2025, per AiScore, kept Real Madrid in it, with a late layup cutting the gap to 8.
• Dzanan Musa (SF, #31): Musa scored 15 points (5-of-12 FG, 1-of-4 3PT) and grabbed 5 rebounds. His 13.8 PPG average showed versatility, though 3 turnovers reflected Panathinaikos’s pressure.
• Edy Tavares (C, #22): Tavares added 12 points (5-of-7 FG) and 8 rebounds, including 3 offensive boards. His 9.6 PPG and 7.2 rebounds per game anchored the paint, but 4 fouls limited his fourth-quarter minutes.

Real Madrid struggled in transition (8 fast-break points) and shot poorly from the line, missing 6 free throws. Their 1.02 PPP lagged behind Panathinaikos, with a 43.1% field-goal rate reflecting off-night shooting, especially from deep (32%).

Offensive Comparison

• Panathinaikos: More efficient (50.8% FG vs. 43.1%) and sharper from three (41.7% vs. 32%). Their 11 turnovers and 22 assists showed better ball movement.
• Real Madrid: Competitive in rebounds (33 vs. 34) but hurt by 13 turnovers and 64.7% free-throw shooting. Their 8-of-25 three-point shooting couldn’t match Panathinaikos’s range.

Defensive Stats: Stops, Blocks, and Steals

Panathinaikos Defensive Highlights

Panathinaikos held Real Madrid to 43.1% shooting and forced 13 turnovers, including 8 steals. Their 4 blocks and 25 defensive rebounds limited Real Madrid to 10 second-chance points. Key defenders:

• Dinos Mitoglou (PF, #44): Mitoglou had 2 blocks, 7 rebounds, and 1 steal, holding Tavares to 5-of-7 shooting. His 6.5 rebounds per game and 1.2 blocks per game in 2025 disrupted Real Madrid’s interior.
• Kendrick Nunn: Beyond scoring, Nunn’s 2 steals pressured Campazzo, forcing 2 turnovers. His 1.5 steals per game added defensive spark.
• Jerian Grant (SG, #22): Grant contributed 1 steal and 4 rebounds, limiting Musa to 1-of-4 threes. His 2.8 assists per game complemented a pesky defensive role.

Panathinaikos’s 1.02 defensive PPP was stellar, with a 45% defensive rebounding rate (25 of 55 missed shots). Their switching defense contained Real Madrid’s pick-and-roll, holding them to 6.2 points per game below their 82.4 PPG average.

Real Madrid Defensive Highlights

Real Madrid allowed 86 points on 50.8% shooting, struggling to stop Panathinaikos’s guards. They forced 11 turnovers and grabbed 24 defensive rebounds but managed only 3 blocks. Standouts:

• Edy Tavares: Tavares’s 2 blocks and 5 defensive rebounds slowed Mitoglou (3-of-6 FG inside). His 1.8 blocks per game in 2025 anchored the paint.
• Facundo Campazzo: Campazzo’s 3 steals targeted Sloukas, forcing 2 turnovers. His 1.9 steals per game kept Real Madrid in the fight.
• Gabriel Deck (SF, #14): Deck added 1 steal and 4 rebounds, holding Hernangomez to 2-of-4 in the post. His 10.2 PPG took a backseat to defensive hustle.

Real Madrid’s 1.15 defensive PPP was subpar, with a 41% defensive rebounding rate (24 of 58 missed shots). Their perimeter defense allowed 10-of-24 threes, a recurring issue against Panathinaikos’s 37% team three-point shooting.

Defensive Comparison

• Panathinaikos: Stronger in forcing turnovers (8 steals vs. 5) and rim protection (4 blocks vs. 3). Their 43.1% field-goal defense outshone Real Madrid’s 50.8%.
• Real Madrid: Competitive in rebounds (24 vs. 25 defensive) but weaker in steals (5 vs. 8) and three-point defense (41.7% allowed).

Head-to-Head Trends and Historical Context

Real Madrid leads the all-time EuroLeague series 25–12 since 2005, per AiScore, but Panathinaikos has won 3 of the last 5, including the 2024 Final (95–80) and this 86–76 game. Key trends:

• Panathinaikos averages 92.2 PPG in their last 5 games vs. Real Madrid, outscoring Real’s 83.2 PPG.
• Real Madrid’s 81.6 PPG allowed vs. Panathinaikos exceeds their 74.0 season average, showing defensive struggles.
• Panathinaikos’s 60% against-the-spread win rate matches Real Madrid’s, but their 85.8% predicted win probability on March 6 proved accurate.

Panathinaikos’s seventh EuroLeague title in 2024, defeating Real Madrid, marked their resurgence under coach Ergin Ataman, while Real Madrid’s 2018 crown and consistent Final Four appearances reflect their pedigree.

Standout Players to Watch

• Panathinaikos: Kendrick Nunn’s scoring (16.8 PPG) and Kostas Sloukas’s playmaking (5.9 APG) drive their offense.
• Real Madrid: Facundo Campazzo’s all-around game (14.5 PPG, 6.2 APG) and Edy Tavares’s rim protection (1.8 BPG) are critical.

Why These Stats Matter

Stats like Nunn’s 22 points or Real Madrid’s 13 turnovers tell the story of Panathinaikos’s home dominance and Real Madrid’s missed opportunities. For bettors, Panathinaikos covering the -4.5 spread (86–76) and the game staying under 165.5 points align with their 40% over rate. For coaches, Panathinaikos’s 1.15 PPP and Real Madrid’s 64.7% free-throw shooting highlight tactical edges. Fans see Sloukas’s clutch three or Tavares’s blocks as game-defining moments, fueling this rivalry’s passion.

How to Track Live Stats

Follow live stats via:

• Sofascore.com: Real-time scoring, rebounds, and assists.
• AiScore.com: Detailed box scores and H2H data.
• Euroleague.net: Official player and team metrics.

Conclusion

The March 6, 2025, Real Madrid Baloncesto vs. Panathinaikos B.C. matchup was a EuroLeague classic, with Panathinaikos’s 86–76 victory showcasing their offensive balance and defensive grit. Kendrick Nunn’s 22 points and Kostas Sloukas’s 7 assists outdueled Facundo Campazzo’s 18 points and Edy Tavares’s 8 rebounds, as Panathinaikos’s 50.8% shooting and 8 steals proved decisive. Real Madrid’s 13 turnovers and 32% three-point shooting exposed cracks, despite their rebounding effort. This game reinforces Panathinaikos’s edge in Athens and Real Madrid’s need for consistency amid injuries. As both teams chase playoff spots—Panathinaikos aiming to defend their title, Real Madrid seeking redemption—these stats offer lessons and excitement. Expect more fireworks when these titans clash again, with Nunn, Sloukas, Campazzo, and Tavares ready to write the next chapter.

FAQS